Reviewed measurements

Compare the evidence.

Two reports. The same workloads. Measured medians in view.

Selected plans
DigitalOceans-2vcpu-4gb
Vultrvoc-c-2c-4gb-50s-amd
Matching observed resources: x86_64 · 2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB RAMSource location: Bangalore, IN · same agent build and methodology.
CPU allocation
2 vCPU
2 vCPU
Observed memory
3.8 GiB
3.8 GiB
Processor
DO-Regular
AMD EPYC-Rome
Location
Bangalore, INblr1
Bangalore, INBLR
OS / architecture
Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS / x86_64
Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS / x86_64
Sampling
1 deployment · 24h run skipped
1 deployment · 24h run skipped
Report date
17 Oct 2026
17 Oct 2026
Methodology
pilot-1 · AI-assisted review
pilot-1 · AI-assisted review
Each column is one deployment. Matching context does not establish equivalent physical hosts.Reviewed data · within-run medians
PerformanceReviewed data
DigitalOcean2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
Vultr2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
01 /

CPU performance

sysbench prime events · max prime 20,000 · gzip level 6 · higher is better

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr voc-c-2c-4gb-50s-amd
Single thread
378.7events/s25% of 1,500
1,352events/s90% of 1,500
All 2 vCPUs
733.0events/s24% of 3,000
2,683events/s89% of 3,000
gzip compression
160.6MiB/s80% of 200
180.9MiB/s90% of 200

Identical thread counts and test settings. Bars use a common scale within each row.

02 /

Memory bandwidth

sysbench · 256 MiB block · one thread · higher is better

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr voc-c-2c-4gb-50s-amd
Read
5,638MiB/s38% of 15,000
13,842MiB/s92% of 15,000
Write
5,856MiB/s39% of 15,000
13,202MiB/s88% of 15,000

Bars share one scale across both rows. A memory copy workload is not part of this profile.

PerformanceReviewed data
DigitalOceanBangalore, IN
VultrBangalore, IN
03 /

Disk performance

fio · direct I/O · 1 MiB / QD32 sequential · 4 KiB / QD32 random

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr voc-c-2c-4gb-50s-amd
Sequential read
5,240MB/s
4,322MB/s
Sequential write
2,292MB/s
2,995MB/s
Random read
84,002IOPS
96,554IOPS
Random write
62,101IOPS
77,691IOPS
Random read p95
585.7µs
436.2µs
Random write p95
839.7µs
569.3µs

Throughput and IOPS: higher is better. Latency: lower is better. Mixed 70/30 runs and p50/p99 latency are in each full report.

04 /

Network performance

Same two controlled London endpoints · one iperf3 stream · 100 Mbit/s rate setting

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr voc-c-2c-4gb-50s-amd
Download · endpoint 1
99.9Mbit/s
99.9Mbit/s
Download · endpoint 2
21.5Mbit/s
99.9Mbit/s
Upload · endpoint 1
97.5Mbit/s
97.0Mbit/s
Upload · endpoint 2
97.2Mbit/s
95.3Mbit/s
Latency · endpoint 1
136.6ms
138.5ms
Latency · endpoint 2
201.2ms
249.2ms

Source location affects latency. Actual bytes can exceed the 64 MiB target; these routes do not measure maximum link capacity. Jitter and packet loss are not reported.

PerformanceReviewed data
DigitalOcean2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
Vultr2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
05 /

PostgreSQL performance

PostgreSQL 16 · pgbench read/write · 4 clients · durability enabled

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr voc-c-2c-4gb-50s-amd
In-memory throughput
2,181transactions/s
2,299transactions/s
In-memory average latency
1.83ms
1.74ms
Storage-bound throughput
1,738transactions/s
2,125transactions/s
Storage-bound average latency
2.30ms
1.88ms

Both dataset profiles shown. This profile records average latency, not percentiles; read throughput and latency together.

06 /

Consistency over 24 hours

Separate 24-hour profile · hourly CPU, memory read and random disk read

Hourly repeat runsCPU · memory · disk
DigitalOcean
Not measured24-hour run skipped
Vultr
Not measured24-hour run skipped
No hourly samples exist for these reports, so no chart is drawn.Skipped runs are not scores.

No 24-hour consistency or long-term reliability is established.

07 /

Inspect the source reports.

Different workloads reveal different trade-offs. Every number links back to its test.