Reviewed measurements

Compare the evidence.

Two reports. The same workloads. Measured medians in view.

Selected plans
DigitalOceans-2vcpu-4gb
Vultrvc2-2c-4gb
Matching observed resources: x86_64 · 2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB RAMSource location: London, UK · same agent build and methodology.
CPU allocation
2 vCPU
2 vCPU
Observed memory
3.8 GiB
3.8 GiB
Processor
DO-Regular
Intel Core (Broadwell, no TSX, IBRS)
Location
London, UKlon1
London, UKLHR
OS / architecture
Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS / x86_64
Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS / x86_64
Sampling
1 deployment · 24h run skipped
1 deployment · 24h run skipped
Report date
17 Oct 2026
17 Oct 2026
Methodology
pilot-1 · AI-assisted review
pilot-1 · AI-assisted review
Each column is one deployment. Matching context does not establish equivalent physical hosts.Reviewed data · within-run medians
PerformanceReviewed data
DigitalOcean2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
Vultr2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
01 /

CPU performance

sysbench prime events · max prime 20,000 · gzip level 6 · higher is better

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr vc2-2c-4gb
Single thread
321.6events/s80% of 400
330.4events/s83% of 400
All 2 vCPUs
626.7events/s78% of 800
659.5events/s82% of 800
gzip compression
160.8MiB/s80% of 200
145.0MiB/s72% of 200

Identical thread counts and test settings. Bars use a common scale within each row.

02 /

Memory bandwidth

sysbench · 256 MiB block · one thread · higher is better

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr vc2-2c-4gb
Read
5,611MiB/s56% of 10,000
9,007MiB/s90% of 10,000
Write
5,829MiB/s58% of 10,000
6,818MiB/s68% of 10,000

Bars share one scale across both rows. A memory copy workload is not part of this profile.

PerformanceReviewed data
DigitalOceanLondon, UK
VultrLondon, UK
03 /

Disk performance

fio · direct I/O · 1 MiB / QD32 sequential · 4 KiB / QD32 random

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr vc2-2c-4gb
Sequential read
4,099MB/s
387.0MB/s
Sequential write
839.1MB/s
362.1MB/s
Random read
58,495IOPS
61,079IOPS
Random write
43,499IOPS
40,182IOPS
Random read p95
823.3µs
905.2µs
Random write p95
1,221µs
1,036µs

Throughput and IOPS: higher is better. Latency: lower is better. Mixed 70/30 runs and p50/p99 latency are in each full report.

04 /

Network performance

Controlled endpoints · one iperf3 stream · 100 Mbit/s rate setting

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr vc2-2c-4gb
Download · endpoint 1
100.1Mbit/s
100.1Mbit/s
Download · endpoint 2
100.1Mbit/s
100.1Mbit/s
Upload · endpoint 1
100.1Mbit/s
100.1Mbit/s
Upload · endpoint 2
100.1Mbit/s
100.1Mbit/s
Latency · endpoint 1
0.68ms
2.95ms
Latency · endpoint 2
3.03ms
0.42ms

Source location affects latency. Actual bytes can exceed the 64 MiB target; these routes do not measure maximum link capacity. Jitter and packet loss are not reported.

PerformanceReviewed data
DigitalOcean2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
Vultr2 vCPU · 3.8 GiB
05 /

PostgreSQL performance

PostgreSQL 16 · pgbench read/write · 4 clients · durability enabled

MetricDigitalOcean s-2vcpu-4gbVultr vc2-2c-4gb
In-memory throughput
1,479transactions/s
2,073transactions/s
In-memory average latency
2.70ms
1.93ms
Storage-bound throughput
1,246transactions/s
1,581transactions/s
Storage-bound average latency
3.21ms
2.53ms

Both dataset profiles shown. This profile records average latency, not percentiles; read throughput and latency together.

06 /

Consistency over 24 hours

Separate 24-hour profile · hourly CPU, memory read and random disk read

Hourly repeat runsCPU · memory · disk
DigitalOcean
Not measured24-hour run skipped
Vultr
Not measured24-hour run skipped
No hourly samples exist for these reports, so no chart is drawn.Skipped runs are not scores.

No 24-hour consistency or long-term reliability is established.

07 /

Inspect the source reports.

Different workloads reveal different trade-offs. Every number links back to its test.